ArticleCureus2026
Solid and Cystic Hidradenoma of the Forearm: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 41-year-old woman presented with a two-year history of a gradually enlarging, tender nodule on the left forearm. Ultrasonography revealed a subcutaneous mass with both solid and cystic components. The lesion was surgically excised in its entirety with local flap closure, and the postoperative course was uneventful. Pathological evaluation confirmed a solid-cystic hidradenoma, a rare tumor of sweat gland origin. While the coexistence of solid and cystic components is an inherent, defining feature of this tumor subtype rather than an atypical finding, this case is notable for its occurrence on the volar forearm, a site with very few comparable adult cases in the published literature. Because hidradenoma is easily mistaken for more common and, in the case of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, potentially malignant, cutaneous lesions, recognizing this diagnosis at atypical sites has direct implications for surgical planning and patient counseling. We present this case to contribute to the limited literature on adult extremity hidradenomas and to reinforce the value of including hidradenoma in the differential diagnosis of nodular cutaneous lesions arising outside its typical head, neck, and trunk distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.