ArticleBioinformatics advances2026
CBIcall: a configuration-driven framework for variant calling in large sequencing cohorts.
Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motivation: Variant calling for next-generation sequencing (NGS) data relies on a diverse ecosystem of tools and workflows. Large-scale collaborative studies increasingly adopt federated analysis, where each institution processes sensitive data locally using standardized pipelines. Deploying identical pipelines across multiple centers remains challenging because heterogeneous software environments and computing policies can cause workflow divergence and inconsistent results. Results: We developed CBIcall, a workflow backend-flexible, configuration-driven framework that runs standardized variant-calling pipelines from raw FASTQ files to analysis-ready VCFs. Users define each analysis in a single YAML parameters file, which CBIcall resolves against a controlled workflow registry and resource catalog. The execution driver validates parameters and checks compatibility among pipelines, analysis modes, workflow backends, genome builds, tool versions, and resource bundles. CBIcall supports reproducibility auditing by comparing executions using recorded provenance and output fingerprints. CBIcall dispatches validated workflows natively through Bash, Cromwell, Nextflow and Snakemake backends and provides production-ready pipelines for germline WES, WGS (single-sample or cohort joint genotyping following GATK Best Practices), and mitochondrial DNA analysis. We evaluated analytical performance using public benchmark datasets and validated reproducibility across four computing environments. We further deployed CBIcall in the EU HEREDITARY project, where it processed 1102 samples with both WES and mtDNA pipelines on an institutional HPC system, supporting its suitability for reproducible cohort-scale genomic analyses. Availability and implementation: CBIcall is open source (GPLv3) and distributed with ready-to-run pipelines; full dependency and installation documentation is available at https://github.com/CNAG-Biomedical-Informatics/cbicall.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.