ArticleCureus2026
Persistent Horner Syndrome Following Benign Gynaecological Surgery: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Horner syndrome is an uncommon neurological disorder resulting from the disruption of the oculosympathetic pathway and classically presents with ipsilateral ptosis, miosis and, variably, facial anhidrosis. Although recognised following cervical, thoracic and vascular procedures, it is rarely reported following benign gynaecological surgery. We present the case of a 44-year-old woman who developed persistent right-sided Horner syndrome following elective subtotal abdominal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy performed under general anaesthesia with spinal anaesthesia. Right-sided ptosis developed on the first postoperative day and was followed by anisocoria without headache, neck pain, visual disturbance or diplopia. Horner syndrome was confirmed by apraclonidine testing. Extensive neurovascular investigations, including computed tomography (CT), CT angiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), excluded intracranial, cervical and vascular pathology. Following multidisciplinary review, perioperative sympathetic chain injury related to neuraxial anaesthesia or patient positioning was considered the most likely explanation. Symptoms persisted at six months despite normal imaging. This case highlights the importance of recognising Horner syndrome after non-cervical surgery, promptly excluding life-threatening causes and considering perioperative sympathetic dysfunction as a diagnosis of exclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.