Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42708045›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2026

Recent progress in nanomaterial-based adsorption technologies for dye removal from wastewater.

Ghadah M Al-Senani, Mahmoud A Hefnawy, Salhah D Al-Qahtani, Samerah I Al-Saeedi, Hoda A Ahmed, Shymaa S Medany

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ghadah M Al-SenaniDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University P.O. Box 84428 Riyadh 11671 Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6999-2544
Mahmoud A HefnawyChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University 12613-Giza Egypt Maadel@cu.edu.eg shymaa@sci.cu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-9323
Salhah D Al-QahtaniDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University P.O. Box 84428 Riyadh 11671 Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3876-0238
Samerah I Al-SaeediDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University P.O. Box 84428 Riyadh 11671 Saudi Arabia.
Hoda A AhmedDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science in Yanbu, Taibah University Yanbu Governorate Saudi Arabia.
Shymaa S MedanyChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University 12613-Giza Egypt Maadel@cu.edu.eg shymaa@sci.cu.edu.eg.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7367-671X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dye-contaminated wastewater from textile, printing, leather, paper, cosmetic, and related industries poses serious environmental and health risks due to the high stability, low biodegradability, and potential toxicity of synthetic dyes. Adsorption has emerged as a practical and efficient treatment method because of its simplicity, flexibility, high removal efficiency, and suitability for different dye classes under mild conditions. This review highlights recent advances in dye removal using advanced adsorbents, particularly nanoparticle-based materials, carbon-based adsorbents, polymers, biopolymers, metal-organic frameworks, and zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Adsorption efficiency is mainly influenced by surface area, pore structure, surface charge, functional groups, adsorbent dosage, initial dye concentration, contact time, temperature, and solution pH. The main removal mechanisms include electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bonding, π-π interactions, ion exchange, surface complexation, pore filling, and coordination interactions. Most reported systems follow pseudo-second-order kinetics, while Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms are commonly used to describe equilibrium behavior. Despite promising laboratory results, practical application remains limited by high production cost, difficult separation, poor regeneration, reduced efficiency in real wastewater, and possible secondary pollution. Future studies should focus on low-cost, reusable, stable, eco-friendly, and scalable adsorbents, with greater attention to real effluents, toxicity assessment, regeneration, economic analysis, and pilot-scale validation.

Identifiers

PMID42708045
PMCPMC13549201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.