ReviewRSC advances2026
Recent progress in nanomaterial-based adsorption technologies for dye removal from wastewater.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dye-contaminated wastewater from textile, printing, leather, paper, cosmetic, and related industries poses serious environmental and health risks due to the high stability, low biodegradability, and potential toxicity of synthetic dyes. Adsorption has emerged as a practical and efficient treatment method because of its simplicity, flexibility, high removal efficiency, and suitability for different dye classes under mild conditions. This review highlights recent advances in dye removal using advanced adsorbents, particularly nanoparticle-based materials, carbon-based adsorbents, polymers, biopolymers, metal-organic frameworks, and zeolitic imidazolate frameworks. Adsorption efficiency is mainly influenced by surface area, pore structure, surface charge, functional groups, adsorbent dosage, initial dye concentration, contact time, temperature, and solution pH. The main removal mechanisms include electrostatic attraction, hydrogen bonding, π-π interactions, ion exchange, surface complexation, pore filling, and coordination interactions. Most reported systems follow pseudo-second-order kinetics, while Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms are commonly used to describe equilibrium behavior. Despite promising laboratory results, practical application remains limited by high production cost, difficult separation, poor regeneration, reduced efficiency in real wastewater, and possible secondary pollution. Future studies should focus on low-cost, reusable, stable, eco-friendly, and scalable adsorbents, with greater attention to real effluents, toxicity assessment, regeneration, economic analysis, and pilot-scale validation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.