Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42708031›Full record

ReviewPCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2026

Assessing mortality risk in narcolepsy: Evidence from population studies.

Nawris Alhassan, Susmin Karki, Jagdish Lal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nawris AlhassanBiomedical Sciences, Hope Clinic Midvale Utah USA.
Susmin KarkiMaharajgunj Medical Campus, Institute of Medicine Tribhuvan University Maharajgunj Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8570-5223
Jagdish LalPhysical & Occupational Rehabilitation Burnaby Chronic Pain & Rehabilitation Clinic Burnaby Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Narcolepsy is a chronic neurologic sleep disorder associated with excessive daytime sleepiness, cataplexy, and a higher prevalence of cardiovascular and psychiatric comorbidities. While these factors may predispose individuals to adverse events, observational studies evaluating mortality in narcolepsy have yielded inconsistent results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the all-cause mortality risk in patients with narcolepsy compared to matched controls. A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted up to February 2026 for studies reporting quantitative mortality metrics (Risk Ratios [RR] and Hazard Ratios [HR]) in narcolepsy. Pooled effect estimates were calculated using random- and fixed-effects models. We also performed sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses based on geographic region (Western vs. Asian) and age (Pediatric vs. Adult/Mixed) to explore heterogeneity. Five studies comprising 212,596 patients with narcolepsy and 526,688,615 controls were included in the primary analysis. The overall pooled RR for mortality was 1.25 (95% CI: 0.98 to 1.61;

Indexed as

meta‐analysismortalitynarcolepsyrisk factorsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42708031
PMCPMC13549222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.