ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Contemporary non-statin therapies for dyslipidemia management: achieving current lipid targets.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current treatment of dyslipidemia in patients with cardiovascular risk (CR) is based on three well-defined principles: First, given the extensive evidence demonstrating the association between elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and cardiovascular risk, the primary therapeutic target is LDL-C. Second, as current guidelines recommend LDL-C targets below 55 mg/dL for high-risk patients, therapeutic goals according to risk level should be achieved as early as possible, and combination therapy is increasingly necessary. Third evidence indicates that non-statin therapies-including ezetimibe, bempedoic acid, PCSK9 inhibitors (evolocumab and alirocumab), and inclisiran-provide substantial LDL-C reductions and reduce cardiovascular events. These agents are particularly effective in very high-risk and statin-intolerant populations, with bempedoic acid addressing both lipid and inflammatory pathways. Additionally, the fixed-dose combination of bempedoic acid and ezetimibe produces an approximately 36.2% reduction in LDL-C in high-risk patients. Risk-stratified guidelines recommend ezetimibe as first-line add-on therapy, followed by PCSK9 inhibitors or bempedoic acid based on residual LDL-C levels and tolerability. Alirocumab has demonstrated a significant reduction in the primary composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), with a favorable trend in all-cause mortality. Furthermore, inflammation (measured by hsCRP) provides complementary prognostic information beyond LDL-C. This expert position paper proposes practical algorithms for a precision medicine approach in Latin America, matching treatment intensity to individual risk profiles for the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.