Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42708003›Full record

ReviewFood science & nutrition2026

A Comprehensive Review on Seaweed Preservation Techniques: Impacts on Nutritional Quality, Safety and Shelf Life.

Shanjida Islam Shikha, Hrishika Barua, Md Faisal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shanjida Islam ShikhaDepartment of Fishing and Post-Harvest Technology Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University Chattogram Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3475-3404
Hrishika BaruaDepartment of Fishing and Post-Harvest Technology Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University Chattogram Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2611-891X
Md FaisalDepartment of Fishing and Post-Harvest Technology Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University Chattogram Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8301-6045

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Seaweeds are important marine resources that contain a great variety of beneficial compounds, including protein, essential fatty acids, vitamins, minerals, fibers, and bioactive compounds such as polyphenols and carotenoids. Nutritional, functional, and industrial properties of these marine algae make them highly applicable to culinary, nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, agricultural, and cosmetic sectors. Seaweeds are perishable as their quality gets highly influenced under certain conditions, such as high moisture content, enzymatic activity, and microbial presence. Parameters such as water activity, lipid indices, total volatile base nitrogen, microbial load, pathogen detection, pH, and sensory properties are used to determine the loss of quality and product stability over time, helping in the determination of the shelf life of seaweed during the post-harvest storage period. To extend the shelf life, several preservation methods have been explored. Traditional methods include sun drying, oven drying, salting, and fermentation, which provide easier and lower-cost conditions, but sometimes cause a compromise in quality. Modern techniques like high-pressure processing, pulsed electric fields, modified atmosphere packaging, and irradiation appear as solutions with lower loss of quality, higher nutrient retention, microbial safety, and sensory attributes. This review critically evaluates post-harvest deterioration mechanisms, quality assessment parameters, traditional and advanced preservation techniques, their impact on shelf life and product quality, and current consumer perceptions to promote sustainable utilization of seaweeds in response to rising global demand.

Indexed as

drying of seaweedseaweedseaweed acceptanceseaweed preservationseaweed shelf life

Identifiers

PMID42708003
PMCPMC13548843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.