ArticleBMJ public health2026
What neighbourhood factors support more transport walking as adults age? A five-wave longitudinal multilevel cohort study in Brisbane, Australia.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Transport walking is a simple, cost-effective and sustainable way to promote physical activity that integrates movement into daily routines. A supportive built environment, including walkable areas-consisting of high residential density, good street connectivity and mixed land-uses-is associated with greater transport walking, making it a critical area for urban planning and policy interventions. However, most studies on age differences in built environment and transport walking are cross-sectional, limiting causal inference and emphasising the need for longitudinal research to strengthen evidence for healthy ageing policies. Methods: This study longitudinally examines age interaction effects with built environment attributes on transport walking, incorporating time-varying exposures and confounders, and accounting for neighbourhood self-selection. Data were from the How Areas in Brisbane Influence HealTh and AcTivity study, a five-wave multilevel cohort study from (2007-2016). Analysis used participants residing at the same address throughout the study. Transport walking was self-reported and classified as walkers or non-walkers. Generalised linear mixed-effects models were used to assess associations between the built environment and transport walking, and their interaction with age, adjusting for sociodemographic factors, length of residence, neighbourhood preference and neighbourhood disadvantage. Results: Higher residential density, street connectivity, land-use mix and walkability were longitudinally associated with greater transport walking. Interaction effects showed that older adults were more likely than younger adults to engage in transport walking in denser, more walkable neighbourhoods. Conclusion: More walkable neighbourhood environments, characterised by higher residential density, street connectivity and land-use mix, were associated with a greater likelihood of transport walking over time. Moreover, the associations with density and walkability were stronger at older ages, suggesting that these attributes may play an important role in supporting healthy ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.