ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Social cognition assessment in Chinese adults with mild cognitive impairment: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Social cognition is a core cognitive domain that is impaired in mild cognitive impairment (MCI), yet the availability and utility of assessment tools for this population in China remain unclear. Objective: This scoping review aimed to systematically map the current evidence on social cognition assessment tools for Chinese older adults with MCI, and to identify gaps in the literature concerning cultural adaptation and psychometric validation. Methods: We systematically searched CNKI, CBM, Wanfang, Weipu, PubMed, and Web of Science up to 23 June 2026. We included original studies that assessed social cognition tools in Chinese MCI patients with controls, extracted data on study design, tools, domains, and results, and conducted a narrative synthesis. Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 198 MCI participants and 197 healthy controls. The assessment tools covered three social cognition domains: empathy, facial emotion recognition, musical emotion recognition, and social perception. All studies reported significant impairments in MCI, particularly in negative emotion recognition (disgust, sadness, fear) and empathy. However, none reported reliability coefficients (e.g., Cronbach's α) or established diagnostic cut-off scores for the Chinese MCI population. Sample sizes were small (range 19-59 per MCI group), and all studies were single-center. Conclusion: Evidence suggests that Chinese MCI patients show social cognition deficits across multiple domains, yet current tools are insufficiently validated and culturally adapted. Future studies may consider multi-center validation, establishing normative data and cut-offs, and developing culturally relevant instruments for China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.