Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707876›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Hearing loss and loneliness in the development of impaired cognition and dementia in the US All of Us cohort: prospective analyses using electronic health records.

Shuai Yang, David A Sbarra, Jingyue Wu, Yann C Klimentidis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuai YangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9547-0837
David A SbarraDepartment of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6727-6552
Jingyue WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3696-2143
Yann C KlimentidisDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6065-4044

Funding

Precision Medicine for All of Us Researchers Collective Medicine de Precision: Colectivo de Investigadores Salud para TodosOT2OD036485 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI KARNES, JASON HANSEN, MORENO, FRANCISCO A · 2023 to 2025
$2.6M
NIH HHS OT2 OD036485
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Hearing loss (HL) and loneliness are independently associated with cognitive decline, yet the extent to which loneliness mediates the HL-cognition relationship remains uncertain. We examined prospective associations among HL, loneliness and incident dementia and impaired cognition (IC) and tested whether loneliness partially mediates the effect of HL on these outcomes. Methods: Using the National Institutes of Health All of Us Controlled Tier V.8 dataset, we fit adjusted Cox proportional hazards models with distinct baselines for HL (first electronic health record (EHR) visit) and loneliness (social determinants of health survey). Loneliness was measured with the UCLA Loneliness Scale-8 (ULS-8) and analysed as the ULS-8 mean. We conducted four-way decomposition mediation analyses to partition total, direct and indirect effects allowing for exposure-mediator interaction. Outcomes (incident dementia and IC) were ascertained from EHRs after the relevant baseline exposure. Sensitivity analyses examined associations in racial/ethnic subgroups, removed the ≥1 year EHR follow-up requirement, accounted for death as a competing risk and used time-varying HL in Cox models. Covariates included age, sex, race, education, income, smoking and alcohol use. Results: The EHR observation base included 317 108 adults (mean overall follow-up, 11.8 years); 50 849 (16.0%) had EHR-documented HL and 130 266 (41.1%) had a scoreable ULS-8 loneliness measure. We observed 5663 incident dementia and 21 117 incident IC events. HL was associated with higher risk of incident dementia (HR=1.38, p<0.001) and IC (HR=1.67, p<0.001). Loneliness (per 1-point increase in ULS-8 mean) was associated with higher incident dementia (HR=1.41, p=0.004) and IC (HR=1.48, p<0.001) risk. Mediation analyses indicated small indirect effects of HL via loneliness. The proportion mediated was approximately 2.5% for dementia (pm=0.025, p=0.081) and 2.0% for IC (pm=0.020, p<0.001). Subgroup analyses suggested stronger HL-dementia associations among black/African American participants and stronger HL-IC associations among Asian and black/African American participants, while results from sensitivity analyses were largely confirmatory. Conclusions: In this large, diverse cohort, HL and loneliness were independently associated with incident dementia and IC. Loneliness mediated only a small fraction of the HL effect, suggesting that most of the observed HL-cognitive outcome association likely operates through pathways other than loneliness. These findings support further evaluation of hearing rehabilitation and social-connection supports as complementary strategies for cognitive health, while suggesting that addressing HL directly may yield broader benefits than targeting loneliness alone.

Indexed as

Public HealthPublic Health PracticeQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42707876
PMCPMC13548250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.