ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2026
Physiology-guided mechanical ventilation: Monitoring, proportional assist, and bounded automation.
Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mechanical ventilation has evolved into a complex intervention that influences lung injuries, respiratory muscle function, and hemodynamic stability. Although lung-protective strategies improve outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome, bedside management remains limited by incomplete monitoring of key physiologic variables, including lung stress, inspiratory effort and regional ventilation. This constrains decision such as positive end-expiratory pressure titration and ventilatory assist targeting. Emerging technologies aim to address these gaps by improving physiological assessment and enabling more individualized care. Tools such as esophageal manometry, airway occlusion pressure (P0.1), diaphragm electrical activity, and electrical impedance tomography provide insight into lung mechanics, respiratory drive, and regional ventilation. Proportional modes of ventilation improve patient-synchrony, though their impact on patient-centered outcomes remains variables. Automation and artificial intelligence are increasingly applied to ventilator management, supporting wave analysis, detection of asynchrony, and prediction of weaning readiness. These tools may also assist clinical decision-making within predefined safety limit. We propose a pragmatic, clinical-directed framework integrating physiologic monitoring, proportional assist, and bounded decision support to optimize lung protection, diaphragm function, and hemodynamica stability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.