Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707863›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2026

Critical care hepatology: A narrative review of current concepts and management.

Iva Kosuta, Ela Curcic Karabaic, Nina Beluhan, Fran Zlopasa, Jaksa Babel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Iva KosutaDivision of Intensive Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
Ela Curcic KarabaicDivision of Intensive Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
Nina BeluhanSchool of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
Fran ZlopasaSchool of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.
Jaksa BabelDivision of Intensive Care, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb 10000, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with advanced liver disease requiring intensive care were long considered to have limited benefit from aggressive treatment, given the high associated mortality. Over recent decades, outcomes have improved with advances in liver transplantation, critical care, and a better understanding of multiorgan failure. Acute liver failure and acute-on-chronic liver failure are now recognized as complex multisystem syndromes in which survival is determined not only by hepatic dysfunction but also by extrahepatic organ failure, systemic inflammation, and infection. Critical care hepatology has therefore evolved as a clinical discipline integrating hepatology, intensive care, and transplant medicine. Modern management requires adaptation of conventional intensive care strategies to the distinct pathophysiological features of liver failure syndromes, together with coordinated multidisciplinary care, often delivered within specialized liver intensive care units. Despite substantial progress, important challenges remain, including limitations of current prognostic models, ongoing debate surrounding transplant allocation policies, and complex decisions regarding transplant candidacy and futility. A structured approach to critical care hepatology may improve care integration and outcomes in critically ill patients with liver disease.

Indexed as

Acute liver failureAcute-on-chronic liver failureCritical care hepatologyLiver cirrhosisLiver transplantation

Identifiers

PMID42707863
PMCPMC13548171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.