ReviewWorld journal of critical care medicine2026
Artificial intelligence for early sepsis detection and dynamic prognostication in onco-critical care.
Review in World journal of critical care medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Critically ill cancer patients have a unique physiological profile marked by severe immunosuppression, frailty, and multimorbidity, making traditional tools like Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment often inadequate for accurate risk assessment. This review explores artificial intelligence's potential to transform onco-critical care from reactive to predictive management. We will synthesize literature on two key applications: Early sepsis detection in critically ill cancer patients and refining mortality prediction models to guide ethical care. The analysis will show how dynamic machine learning models, unlike static scores, use vital signs, lab trends, and unstructured machine learning data to detect deterioration hours before clinical decompensation. The review will also examine barriers to adoption, highlighting the need for explainable artificial intelligence to build clinician trust and address data heterogeneity across cancer populations. Ultimately, it will suggest that analytics can transform oncology intensive care unit care, balancing aggressive treatments and palliative care. While focusing on cancer patients, some evidence from general intensive care unit populations will be identified as extrapolated with caution, given different pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.