ArticleRevista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
Efficacy of light-cured luting systems for CAD-CAM milled resin indirect restorations.
Article in Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the bond strength of three light-cured luting systems for CAD-CAM milled resin indirect restorations using a shear bond strength test. Materials and Methods: Thirty Brava Block resin cylinders were fabricated using a CAD-CAM milling unit and subjected to surface treatment with 50-μm aluminum oxide airborne-particle abrasion, ultrasonic cleaning, and application of Monobond N silane primer. Specimens were randomly assigned to three groups (Variolink Esthetic LC, RelyX Veneer, and Allcem Veneer APS) and luted according to each manufacturer's instructions. After light activation, samples were stored at 37°C for 24 hours. Shear bond strength testing was performed, and failure modes were classified. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test (α = 0.05). Results: RelyX Veneer and Allcem Veneer APS protocols produced the highest bond strength values to CAD-CAM milled Brava Block resin (p < 0.05), with no significant difference between them (p > 0.05). Variolink Esthetic LC showed significantly lower values (p < 0.05). Cohesive failure within the milled resin predominated across all groups, while Variolink Esthetic LC exhibited a more balanced failure distribution (30% adhesive, 40% cohesive in resin, 30% mixed). Conclusions: The light-cured luting systems RelyX Veneer and Allcem Veneer APS provided superior bond strength to CAD-CAM milled resin compared with Variolink Esthetic LC, supporting their clinical use in indirect adhesive restorations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.