ReviewRevista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur)
Efficiency of platelet-rich plasma in management of oral lichen planus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Revista cientifica odontologica (Universidad Cientifica del Sur). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Over the years, studies investigating platelet-rich plasma as a future therapy for oral lichen planus have been on the rise. However, thorough evaluation is required to determine its efficacy, since various studies are being carried out on diverse population with long-term follow-ups. Objective: To evaluate the current evidences to analyze the efficiency of platelet-rich plasma as a treatment modality for oral lichen planus. Material and Methods: This review adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Studies published within the last eight years were screened across multiple databases such as PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Science Direct. The studies eligible were: randomized controlled trials; cohort; and longitudinal designs comparing PRP with other treatment modalities of which six clinical studies were included which had 129 participants in total. Cochrane Risk of bias (RoB) tool was used for Visual analog scale values were pooled for meta-analysis. Meta-analyses were performed using fixed-effect models. Results: Clinically, both control and intervention groups exhibited a pooled mean difference of 0.61, 95% CI (0.22-0.99). As there were variations within the studies, the fixed effects model was chosen for analysis. Comparative analysis of the results demonstrated that both the platelet-based therapies and the topical corticosteroid approach improved patient satisfaction and comparably reduced pain and lesion size in individuals with erosive OLP in similar measures Conclusion: Oral lichen planus can be safely and perhaps effectively treated with platelet-rich plasma. Future studies should adopt a standardised approach in evaluating efficacy of PRP in OLP. Rigorous clinical trials less heterogeneity in the methodology is required for high-quality evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.