Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707801›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

A Case of High-Risk Acute Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection in a Right-Sided Aortic Arch Presenting With Transient Hemiparesis.

Aoumar G Chamma, Wendy Saliba, Linda Chamma

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aoumar G ChammaCardiology, University of Balamand, Beirut, LBN.
Wendy SalibaCardiology, University of Balamand, Beirut, LBN.
Linda ChammaUrology, Lebanese University, Beirut, LBN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute aortic dissection usually presents with abrupt chest or back pain, but neurological symptoms may dominate the presentation and mimic acute ischemic stroke. We report a case of a 50-year-old woman who presented with recurrent transient left-sided weakness. The initial episode persisted during early hospital assessment and resolved as brain magnetic resonance imaging was initiated. A second episode occurred during subsequent aortic computed tomography angiography and lasted approximately 20 minutes. Brain computed tomography and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging showed no acute abnormality, while magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck showed no large-vessel occlusion or cervical arterial involvement. A marked inter-arm blood pressure difference prompted computed tomography angiography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, which demonstrated an acute Stanford type B aortic dissection extending from the proximal descending thoracic aorta to the infrarenal abdominal aorta. The dissection occurred in a Type I right-sided aortic arch with mirror-image branching, consisting of a left brachiocephalic trunk followed by the right common carotid and right subclavian arteries. The dissected descending thoracic aorta measured up to 6.7 × 5.4 cm. The patent false lumen supplied the right renal artery, with delayed right renal enhancement suggesting impaired perfusion despite preserved serum creatinine. These high-risk imaging findings supported early intervention after multidisciplinary evaluation. On hospital day 3, the patient underwent a single-session hybrid repair consisting of bilateral carotid-subclavian bypasses, proximal embolization of both subclavian arteries, and thoracic endovascular aortic repair using two overlapping stent grafts. Completion angiography showed exclusion of antegrade false-lumen flow through the treated proximal entry region and preserved right renal perfusion through distal false-lumen re-entry. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage and perioperative pressure augmentation were used for spinal cord protection. The patient was discharged without neurological deficit or major postoperative complication. Clinical evaluation and surveillance computed tomography angiography were planned at the one-month post-repair interval. Completion angiography documented immediate procedural success, while durable technical success remained to be confirmed by surveillance computed tomography angiography because of the residual focal graft malapposition and continued false-lumen-dependent right renal perfusion. This case highlights the importance of considering acute aortic disease in patients with recurrent focal neurological deficits, normal cerebral imaging, and marked inter-arm blood pressure asymmetry, even in the absence of typical thoracic pain. It also illustrates how Type I right-sided aortic arch anatomy and severe arch angulation can complicate proximal landing-zone planning and require an individualized hybrid repair strategy.

Indexed as

carotid-subclavian bypassmirror-image branchingright-sided aortic archspinal cord protectionstanford type b aortic dissectionthoracic endovascular aortic repairtransient hemiparesis

Identifiers

PMID42707801
PMCPMC13548099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.