ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Microvascular Flaps From the Ear in Nasal Reconstruction: Aesthetic and Patient-reported Outcomes.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study evaluates the aesthetic results and patient-reported outcomes following the use of microvascular flaps from the ear in nasal reconstruction. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients who underwent nasal reconstruction with a microvascular ear flap between 2011 and 2021. Eleven plastic surgeons evaluated postoperative photographs using the validated observer-rated disfigurement scale and 5-point scales assessing the shape and color of the nose and donor ear appearance. Patient satisfaction with the reconstructed nose was assessed with the FACE-Q rhinoplasty module and satisfaction with the donor ear with 6-point scales. Results: Twenty-eight patients with microsurgical ear flaps were identified. One nasal subunit was reconstructed in 16 patients and the total nose in 3. Photographs were available for 25 patients. The shape and color of the reconstructed nose, and the shape of the ear, were assessed as good by the surgeons (median scores 2 IQR 2-3]; 2 [IQR 1-2], and 2 [IQR 1-3], respectively), whereas facial disfigurement was assessed as moderate (median score 3 [IQR 3-4]). Fifteen patients completed the questionnaire, reporting high levels of satisfaction with the appearance of the nose (median score 60; IQR 54-65) and nostrils (median score 64; IQR 42-81), and acceptable symmetry of the ears (median score 2; IQR 1-3). Conclusions: Microvascular flaps from the ear are a good alternative for complex nasal reconstruction, often yielding aesthetically favorable results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.