ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026
Research Progress of Sepsis and Nutrition: A Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome resulting from a dysregulated host response to infection, which substantially increases the risk of progressive organ dysfunction and mortality. This study employs a comprehensive bibliometric analysis to systematically map the global scientific output and evolving research trends pertaining to sepsis and nutritional interventions. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) to identify peer-reviewed publications addressing the nexus between nutrition and sepsis. Bibliometric analysis and visualization were subsequently performed through R (version4.4.0) with the R-bibliometrix package (version4.2.3), VOSviewer software (version 1.6.20) and CiteSpace (version 6.4.1). Results: From 2005 to 2025, a total of 2615 English articles on nutrition and sepsis were identified. The Conclusion: This study provided a comprehensive overview of the global research landscape on sepsis and nutrition. The research results showed that parenteral and enteral nutrition, as the two core methods of clinical nutritional support, are currently the research focus. These findings might help guide researchers in determining the future directions of sepsis and nutrition research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.