ArticleJournal of ultrasonography2025
Diagnosis of foot foreign bodies with ultrasound: a case series from the pediatric emergency department.
Article in Journal of ultrasonography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Foot foreign body injuries are prevalent among pediatric populations, posing diagnostic and management challenges. X-ray examination is the first choice used by emergency physicians for localization and removal of foreign objects but it has limited value when the foreign body is not radiopaque, leading to missed diagnoses of non-radiopaque foreign bodies, we recommend simultaneous use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to rule out foreign body in every case especially when history and clinical exam highly suggestive of foreign body. This case series highlights the diagnostic utility of X-ray and POCUS in the emergency department and its sensitivity in detecting radiopaque and as well radiolucent foreign objects. Material and methods: We describe a case series of foot foreign bodies in children, highlighting the clinical characteristics, diagnostic challenges, and utility of POCUS in the pediatric emergency department. Some patients had delayed presentation in the emergency department due to missed diagnosis in the first place. Results: Patient with sharp foreign bodies, such as glass, typically present with more pain and refusal to bear weight, and POCUS was also difficult, as while probing the area they experienced severe pain. Soft-tissue foreign bodies such as wood, glass and plastic may remain undetected on radiography, but are easily detected by bedside POCUS. Conclusions: This case series underscores the importance of early recognition and utility of POCUS as well as proper exposure X-ray imaging as the first choice for emergency physicians for ruling out foreign bodies in the foot.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.