Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707701›Full record

ArticleSexual medicine2026

An open-label, single-dose, randomized, parallel-group study of the safety and relative bioavailability of topical sildenafil cream vs oral sildenafil in healthy male adults.

Katherine Cornell, Isabella Johnson, Andrea Thurman, David Friend

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine CornellStrategic Science & Technologies (SST) LLC, Cambridge, MA 02141,  United States.
Isabella JohnsonDaré Bioscience, San Diego, CA 92122, United States.
Andrea ThurmanDaré Bioscience, San Diego, CA 92122, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9826-6664
David FriendDaré Bioscience, San Diego, CA 92122, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Oral phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors are commonly prescribed for erectile dysfunction (ED), but have limiting side effects, particularly for men with serious cardiovascular disease. Topical sildenafil cream was developed based on the hypothesis that local genital application would result in less systemic exposure and fewer side effects compared to oral sildenafil citrate. The objective of this study was to describe the systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of topical sildenafil cream 3.6% in healthy men, applied to the penis with and without male condom use, compared to oral sildenafil. Methods: Phase 1, open-label, single-dose, randomized, parallel-group design. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to 36 mg of sildenafil in 1 g of cream or 71 mg of sildenafil in 2 g of cream self-applied to the penile skin with or without male condom use vs a 50 mg oral dose of sildenafil. Blood and orthostatic vital signs were taken prior to dosing and up to 32 hours post dosing. Safety was assessed by treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and physical exam. Single dose PK parameters for plasma sildenafil and its active metabolite, N-desmethyl sildenafil were calculated. Results: Sixty-two men received study medication. All TEAEs ( Discussion: This safety and PK study provides early data on the comparison of Sildenafil cream topical dosing to the oral dosing referent. Topically applied Sildenafil Cream was safe and well tolerated by healthy men. Topical sildenafil cream use was associated with lower systemic exposure compared to oral sildenafil use.

Indexed as

erectile dysfunctionpharmacokineticssafetytopical sildenafil

Identifiers

PMID42707701
PMCPMC13547850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.