ArticleSexual medicine2026
An open-label, single-dose, randomized, parallel-group study of the safety and relative bioavailability of topical sildenafil cream vs oral sildenafil in healthy male adults.
Article in Sexual medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Oral phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors are commonly prescribed for erectile dysfunction (ED), but have limiting side effects, particularly for men with serious cardiovascular disease. Topical sildenafil cream was developed based on the hypothesis that local genital application would result in less systemic exposure and fewer side effects compared to oral sildenafil citrate. The objective of this study was to describe the systemic pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of topical sildenafil cream 3.6% in healthy men, applied to the penis with and without male condom use, compared to oral sildenafil. Methods: Phase 1, open-label, single-dose, randomized, parallel-group design. Participants were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to 36 mg of sildenafil in 1 g of cream or 71 mg of sildenafil in 2 g of cream self-applied to the penile skin with or without male condom use vs a 50 mg oral dose of sildenafil. Blood and orthostatic vital signs were taken prior to dosing and up to 32 hours post dosing. Safety was assessed by treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and physical exam. Single dose PK parameters for plasma sildenafil and its active metabolite, N-desmethyl sildenafil were calculated. Results: Sixty-two men received study medication. All TEAEs ( Discussion: This safety and PK study provides early data on the comparison of Sildenafil cream topical dosing to the oral dosing referent. Topically applied Sildenafil Cream was safe and well tolerated by healthy men. Topical sildenafil cream use was associated with lower systemic exposure compared to oral sildenafil use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.