Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707678›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

A Bridge Between Oral Hygiene and Critical Care: Reviewing a Variety of Oral Hygiene Interventions on Critically Ill Patients to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP).

Subramanian Chokkalingam

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Subramanian ChokkalingamDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Health Education North West, Liverpool, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is one of the common causes of severe morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients who are under mechanical ventilation for more than 48 hours. VAP is multifactorial, and poor oral hygiene could be one of the contributing factors for the development of VAP. The main reason is the aspiration of oropharyngeal secretions containing pathogenic microorganisms, eventually leading to colonisation of virulent oral microorganisms in the respiratory tract, which could potentially increase the risk of development of pneumonia. In spite of having better clinical knowledge, greater experience, and advanced technologies, intensivists are still facing challenges in preventing VAP in mechanically ventilated patients. There are various evidence-based strategies employed to maintain better oral health in critically ill patients to prevent the incidence of VAP. This review aims to discuss the different interventions used to maintain oral health in mechanically ventilated patients.

Indexed as

mechanical ventilationmicroaspirationnosocomial infectionoral hygiene maintenanceoral microbiome dysbiosisventilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID42707678
PMCPMC13549206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.