ReviewFood science & nutrition2026
From Macronutrients to Functional Foods: Nutritional Strategies for Recovery Following High-Intensity Exercise.
Review in Food science & nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-intensity exercise improves aerobic and anaerobic performance, neuromuscular function, and sport-specific readiness but may also induce glycogen depletion, exercise-induced muscle damage, muscle soreness, inflammatory responses, oxidative stress, and temporary reductions in subsequent performance. Recovery nutrition is therefore essential to restore physiological readiness. This review aimed to synthesize current evidence on nutritional strategies for recovery following high-intensity exercise, ranging from foundational macronutrients to functional foods and bioactive compounds. A structured narrative review was conducted using peer-reviewed literature retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. Priority was given to position stands, consensus statements, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and human intervention studies published in English between 2011 and May 2026. Eligible studies involved athletes or physically active adults and examined biochemical, perceptual, or functional recovery outcomes after high-intensity, repeated-sprint, resistance, eccentric, or muscle-damaging exercise. Carbohydrate and protein remain the most consistently supported nutritional strategies for recovery. Carbohydrate facilitates glycogen resynthesis, particularly when recovery time is limited, whereas high-quality protein supports muscle protein synthesis and tissue repair. Functional foods and bioactive compounds may provide additional benefits as adjunct recovery strategies, although the available evidence varies considerably across exercise models, participant characteristics, supplementation protocols, and recovery outcomes. Among the functional foods reviewed, tart cherry currently has the strongest supporting evidence for selected recovery outcomes. Curcumin, omega-3 fatty acids, and beetroot have shown promising context-dependent benefits, whereas evidence for pomegranate, cocoa flavanols, and green tea remains more variable and is generally stronger for oxidative-stress modulation than for consistent improvements in functional recovery. Chronic high-dose vitamin C and E supplementation may impair training adaptations. Based on the synthesized evidence, we propose a hierarchical and periodized conceptual framework for recovery nutrition following high-intensity exercise, in which carbohydrate and protein adequacy remain the primary priorities. Within this framework, functional foods and bioactive compounds may serve as context-dependent adjuncts, and their application should be individualized according to recovery demands, competition schedule, adaptation goals, and the current strength and consistency of the available evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.