Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707605›Full record

ArticleTranslational animal science2026

Effect of sample storage on pH-value in equine faeces.

Katrin Madelene Lindroth, Cecilia Elisabeth Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katrin Madelene LindrothDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 75007, Sweden.
Cecilia Elisabeth MüllerDepartment of Applied Animal Science and Welfare, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, 75007, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurements of pH-value in equine faeces are often performed in studies on nutrition and health in horses, but a standard protocol for it is lacking despite the knowledge that different sample handling may affect the pH-value. Sample handling prior to pH-measurement is often determined by practical settings and has been reported to vary in published studies within the area. The purpose of the current study was therefore to investigate the influence of different combinations of storage time and temperature on the pH-value in equine faecal samples in comparison to immediate pH-measurement at defecation. Faecal samples from 105 horses were collected, and each sample was divided into 14 sub-samples. The sub-samples were stored in room temperature (+20 to + 21°C), in a refrigerator (+4 to + 6°C) or in a freezer (-20°C) for different periods of time, after which pH was measured. Measurement of pH was performed immediately at defecation (reference value, RT0), after 2 h in room temperature (RT2), after 2, 4, 8, 12, 24 and 48 h in a refrigerator (RE2-RE48;), after 24, 48 and 72 h in a freezer (F24-F72), and after 1, 3 and 6 months in the same freezer (F1M-F6M). Measurements of pH were done on undiluted liquid pressed from whole faecal samples using a two-point calibrated pH-meter and was repeated three times on each sub-sample. Data were analysed using an ANOVA mixed model procedure with sample treatment (temperature and time) as a fixed effect and horse as a random effect, and with Dunnetts adjustment of

Indexed as

acidityfaecalhindguthorsestool

Identifiers

PMID42707605
PMCPMC13548788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.