ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
From data silos to integrated diagnosis: multimodal machine learning in glioblastoma.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effective glioblastoma care requires integrating multiparametric longitudinal MRI with histopathology, molecular profiling, and clinical records documenting surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and supportive treatments. In routine practice, however, these data streams are often evaluated separately rather than jointly, which can delay molecularly informed stratification, limit reproducibility across centers, and complicate interpretation of post-treatment imaging changes. Multimodal machine learning (MML) provides a framework for clinical decision support by integrating diverse patient data across the course of care, from symptom presentation through diagnosis to treatment decisions. By combining MRI, whole-slide pathology, molecular and methylation profiling, and treatment timelines derived from electronic health records, MML models can capture disease characteristics over time across biological scales through representation learning and multimodal fusion. Importantly, these approaches can incorporate uncertainty through model calibration and confidence-aware predictions. When rigorously developed and validated, MML models may generate clinically relevant outputs, including integrated diagnosis, molecular classification, individualized survival estimates, probabilistic discrimination between tumor progression and pseudo-progression, and stratification for clinical trial eligibility. In this Mini Review, we summarize recent advances and emerging translational evidence for clinically oriented MML in glioblastoma, with particular emphasis on MRI-centered systems that integrate imaging with pathology, selected molecular measurements, and longitudinal clinical context. We also outline key methodological and practical considerations, including dataset curation, leakage control, external validation, calibration, and post-deployment monitoring-required to support safe, robust, and generalizable implementation of MML approaches in neuro-oncology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.