Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707595›Full record

ReviewDEN open2027

Cold Resection for Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors: Current Evidence and Clinical Perspectives.

Yuichiro Mikuriya, Kohei Takizawa, Nobuhisa Minakata, Kazuo Shiotsuki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in DEN open, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuichiro MikuriyaDepartment of Gastroenterology Kanagawa Cancer Center Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3781-641X
Kohei TakizawaDepartment of Gastroenterology Kanagawa Cancer Center Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7702-0427
Nobuhisa MinakataDepartment of Gastroenterology Kanagawa Cancer Center Kanagawa Japan.
Kazuo ShiotsukiDepartment of Gastroenterology Kanagawa Cancer Center Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0888-3318

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) are increasingly treated with endoscopic resection. Although conventional thermal techniques are effective, the thin duodenal wall and distinctive anatomy have driven interest in cold resection techniques that avoid electrocautery-related injury. This narrative review individually appraises cold snare polypectomy (CSP), cold forceps polypectomy (CFP), and cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection (CS-EMR) for duodenal SNADETs. Management of selected small low-grade adenomas should be individualized, with careful surveillance considered as an alternative to immediate resection. When resection is chosen, CSP is the principal cold resection technique for lesions <10 mm that are optically diagnosed as low-grade adenomas using white-light imaging and narrow-band imaging. CSP appears technically feasible and safe for selected small SNADETs. However, its shallow resection depth limits vertical margin assessment. Available follow-up data suggest low recurrence rates, and recurrent lesions are generally small and endoscopically manageable. This review also discusses the importance of pretreatment optical diagnosis, appropriate lesion selection, technical considerations, and structured surveillance after cold resection. CFP may be considered for carefully selected diminutive lesions, although the supporting evidence remains limited. Although CS-EMR can enable resection of larger lesions, substantial recurrence rates and the reported risk of perforation argue against its routine use. Overall, CSP is the principal cold resection technique for selected small low-grade adenomas, whereas CFP and CS-EMR have more limited roles.

Indexed as

adenomaduodenal neoplasmsendoscopic mucosal resectionnarrow band imagingtreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID42707595
PMCPMC13548780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.