ArticleSage open aging
From Evidence to Action: Translating Research Into Policy and Practice Communication Tools.
Article in Sage open aging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preference-based, person-centered care is essential to improving quality of life for older adults living in nursing homes (NHs). Communicating the rationale to implement evidence-based practices to policy makers and NH administrators amid competing priorities is challenging. Objective: This article describes an initiative that developed two communication tools-a value proposition statement and a policy brief-to promote adoption of the evidence-based Preferences for Everyday Living Inventory (PELI) in NHs. Methods: The PELI is a validated assessment that elicits NH residents' daily living preferences to inform care planning. Guided by knowledge translation, this project aimed to bridge research evidence and practice realities. To develop the value proposition statement, we identified the primary audience, developed a draft, and sought feedback from professionals to create a final version and accompanying policy brief. Results: A value proposition statement and a policy brief were created to communicate the return on investment of preference-based care and identify policy levers to incentivize implementation. Discussion: This initiative demonstrates how applied gerontological research can inform system-level change by supporting moving of preference-based, person-centered care from evidence to everyday practice. The tools serve complementary purposes, engaging providers and policymakers to communicate evidence into practice and policy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.