ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2026
One syndrome, many diseases: toward precision pharmacotherapy in acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality despite advances in supportive care and decades of unsuccessful pharmacologic investigation. A central limitation has been the treatment of ARDS as a uniform clinical syndrome rather than a biologically heterogeneous condition characterized by distinct mechanisms of injury, repair, and therapeutic responsiveness. Recent advances in biomarker profiling, transcriptomics, and data-driven phenotyping have identified reproducible biological subphenotypes, including hyperinflammatory and hypoinflammatory states associated with differing outcomes and treatment responses. Complementary frameworks such as endotypes and treatable traits offer a more mechanistic approach to stratification by linking specific biological processes, including dysregulated inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, coagulation abnormalities, and impaired epithelial repair, to potential therapeutic targets. In this narrative review, we examine how biological heterogeneity may explain the repeated failure of pharmacologic trials in unselected ARDS populations and critically evaluate emerging targeted therapeutic strategies, including anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant and endothelial-directed, epithelial reparative, and adjunctive or repurposed interventions. We also discuss how treatment response may depend not only on biological phenotype, but on disease stage and temporal evolution. Finally, we examine the clinical and methodological requirements for implementing precision pharmacotherapy in ARDS, including biomarker-guided enrichment, adaptive trial design, and integration of artificial intelligence-driven multimodal data analysis. Although major barriers remain, including biomarker validation, bedside feasibility, and prospective clinical testing, the most credible path forward is unlikely to be a universal therapy for ARDS, but rather biologically and temporally tailored treatment strategies matched to the patients most likely to benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.