ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
"I Am Not Struggling Alone": communicating support through peer mutual aid to reduce academic stress transmission and emotional contagion in large university classes.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large university classes are important communication environments in which students observe, interpret, and exchange stress-related information. Academic stress may therefore spread not only through individual experience but also through interpersonal communication and social interpretation,and shared meaning-making processes. How students communicate about academic challenges, interpret peers' stress-related cues, and construct shared understandings of academic pressure may therefore influence whether stress becomes socially amplified or collectively managed. This study examined whether a brief peer mutual-aid routine was associated with lower academic stress transmission and negative emotional contagion by making academic struggle more visible, shareable, and collectively manageable. A two-wave quasi-experimental design was used with 460 students at T1 and 382 usable follow-up cases at T2. The intervention embedded small mutual-aid groups into large lecture sections through guided check-ins, reciprocal help-seeking norms, shared planning, and brief collective coping routines. Multi-item measures assessed peer support, academic stress, stress transmission, negative emotional contagion, class belonging, collective coping efficacy, help-seeking openness, and academic loneliness. Baseline-adjusted ANCOVA models indicated that students in peer mutual-aid sections reported higher T2 peer support, belonging, collective coping efficacy, and help-seeking openness, and lower T2 academic stress, stress transmission, negative emotional contagion, and academic loneliness than students in standard large lecture sections. Effects remained significant after multiple-comparison correction. The findings suggest that peer mutual aid in large classes may be associated with less spread of academic distress not by denying stress, but by reshaping the communication processes through which students encounter, interpret, negotiate, and collectively manage academic challenges. More broadly, the findings support the view that academic stress transmission is not merely a psychological phenomenon but also a communicative process embedded in everyday peer interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.