ReviewFrontiers in chemistry2026
Electrochemical polishing of additively manufactured titanium alloys: a mechanism-to-parameter framework for process design.
Review in Frontiers in chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) has expanded the use of titanium and its alloys in aerospace, biomedical, marine, and automotive components, but the rapid melting-solidification cycles inherent to AM leave characteristic surface defects-balling, partially melted particles, scan-track ridges, and near-surface porosity-that make post-process finishing essential. Electrochemical polishing (ECP) is a leading candidate because material is removed by anodic dissolution, allowing treatment of geometrically complex surfaces inaccessible to mechanical methods. The literature available to newcomers remains divided: classical electropolishing theory addresses idealized surfaces prior to AM, while recent AM reviews focus empirically on electrolytes and roughness outcomes rather than current-distribution and mass-transport physics. Consequently, researchers often reproduce published conditions as empirical recipes, relying on trial-and-error optimization. This review is therefore organized not as a chronological survey but as a mechanism-to-parameter design framework for engineers adopting ECP for Ti and Ti-6Al-4V. It (i) relates classical current-distribution theory (primary, secondary, and tertiary distributions; the Wagner number (Wa)) and salt-film and acceptor-based mass-transport mechanisms to macro- and micro-smoothing of AM Ti surfaces and to the diffusion-limited plateau of the J-V curve that defines the practical process window; (ii) decomposes electrolytes into functional units-solvent, supporting electrolyte, acid, and additive-so that composition becomes a set of design rules rather than a list of recipes; (iii) consolidates acid-based, organic, ionic-liquid, and deep-eutectic systems, and AM and wrought substrates, into a unified condition database; and (iv) positions finite-element (COMSOL and others) prediction of fields, current-density distributions, and material removal as a means of narrowing the experimental search space. Viewed through this framework, the diversity of reported ECP conditions converges on one objective: forming and sustaining a stable, mass-transport-controlled interfacial layer. Viscosity, additive chemistry, agitation, temperature, and waveform are not independent variables but alternative routes to controlling the diffusion layer, and specimen geometry sets how much geometry-driven current concentration can contribute to leveling. Framed this way, condition selection becomes a reasoned choice of where to sit within the process window rather than searching across a catalogue of recipes-the basis on which ECP can be transferred from coupon-level demonstrations to component-scale Ti parts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.