ArticleJournal for person-oriented research2026
Hybrid Work Profiles and Team Functioning: A Person-Centered Analysis of Hybrid Work Quality.
Article in Journal for person-oriented research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hybrid work has become a widespread organizational practice, yet employees' experiences remain highly heterogeneous. Adopting a person-oriented perspective, this study examines whether employees' perceptions of hybrid work resources are associated with distinct patterns of team-related processes. Drawing on the Quality of Telework (QoT) framework, hybrid work quality is conceptualized as a configurational phenomenon in which multiple resources co-occur within individuals rather than operating independently. Using latent profile analysis on data from 719 hybrid workers across four organizations, we identified four distinct profiles based on key QoT resources (i.e., remote and office-based workstations, flextime, and enabling management). These profiles differed systematically in team identification, knowledge sharing, collective self-efficacy, satisfaction with hybrid teamwork, and perceived team efficiency. The findings suggest that hybrid work experiences form qualitatively distinct patterns, with more balanced configurations of resources associated with more positive perceptions of team functioning. By focusing on configurations rather than isolated predictors, this study contributes to extending the QoT framework and demonstrates the value of person-oriented approaches for capturing heterogeneity in contemporary work contexts. More broadly, the results highlight how combinations of work-related conditions are linked to different experiential patterns, offering a more nuanced understanding of hybrid work and its implications for team-related processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.