ArticleERJ open research2026
A protocol for validation of novel artificial intelligence-based framework for dyspnoea investigation with cardiopulmonary exercise testing.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Exertional dyspnoea largely represents the sensory translation of an ever-growing dynamic mismatch between ventilatory demand and capacity as exercise intensifies. This fundamental tenet, however, has not been formally incorporated into data display and clinical interpretation of incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). The objectives of the present study were to validate a novel framework (Dynamic Assessment of Dyspnoea and Ventilation on Exercise (DyVe-X)) to quantify the severity of exertional dyspnoea while exposing its mechanical-ventilatory underpinnings across progressively higher exercise intensities in subjects showing varied pre-test likelihood of abnormality. Methods: Incremental CPET data from three large cohorts of tobacco-exposed subjects: smokers and ex-smokers at risk for, or at different stages of, COPD (n=1161). Based on recently published normative data, a homonymous software (DyVe-X 1.0.0 Kingston, ON, Canada) uses an algorithm based on artificial intelligence techniques to establish the burden of 1) exertional dyspnoea Implications: This study may validate an original framework for investigating dyspnoea using CPET, characterised by continuous assessment of symptom intensity and time course, in light of the rate of dynamic depletion of mechanical-ventilatory reserves.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.