ArticleBMJ neurology open2026
Moving beyond monitoring: wearable technology (PKG) for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease.
Article in BMJ neurology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of wearable technology results in objective and reliable monitoring of motor activity in Parkinson's disease (PD) but its utility as a diagnostic aid has not been assessed. Objectives: To assess whether a Personal KinetiGraph (PKG) performed at baseline and again following a long-form levodopa (LD) challenge (increasing to 300 mg daily over a minimum of 6 weeks) is a useful discriminator in those with parkinsonism but diagnostic uncertainty. Methods: Over a 10-year period, 26 patients with parkinsonism in whom there was diagnostic uncertainty due to clinical complexity or conflicting evidence were tested with a PKG, recording bradykinesia and tremor before and after formalised treatment with LD. Patients were followed for a median of 46.5 months (mean 49.8) to establish a 'final' clinical diagnosis. Results: Of the 15/26 diagnostically uncertain patients with a 'final' diagnosis of PD, the PKG demonstrated bradykinesia (mean bradykinesia score ≥25) at baseline in 14/15; in 12/15, bradykinesia improved with LD and, when present, tremor was similarly reduced. In the 11/26 patients who had a final diagnosis other than PD, the PKG recorded bradykinesia in 3/11 with improved bradykinesia and reduced tremor in only 1/11. PKG-defined bradykinesia coupled with LD responsiveness was 88% sensitive (95% CI 57% to 98%) and 89% specific (95% CI 52% to 99%) for a 'final' PD diagnosis in this select group. Additionally, PKG-defined tremor and LD responsiveness had a sensitivity of 85% (95% CI 55% to 98%) and specificity of 89% (95% CI 52% to 99%). Conclusion: PKG-defined bradykinesia and tremor coupled with LD responsiveness appear to be predictive of an eventual PD diagnosis in diagnostically challenging cases. Larger studies are required to verify these conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.