Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707462›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

SE-ResAutoNet: an attention and residual learning framework for reliable gait-based suspect identification.

Vaishnavi Munusamy, Sudha Senthilkumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Vaishnavi MunusamySchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sudha SenthilkumarSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait recognition relies on the distinctive walking pattern of the individuals that helps to identify the person accurately even in the long distance or in varied environments without any user interaction. Unlike existing techniques, the method works independently, it does not depend on a person engaging or interacting directly with the system. The SE-ResAutoNet (Squeeze-and-Excitation Residual Autoencoder Network) proposed in this study, an autoencoder framework which adopts SE blocks and Residual Blocks in their architecture for better feature representation and classification accuracy. The attention based - residual learning helps to capture the complex pattern effectively. The SE-ResAutoNet model has achieved an average accuracy of 95.75% across 5-fold cross-validation under normal, slow, and fast walking conditions, along with high precision, recall, and Rank-1 identification performance, demonstrating the consistency and robustness of the model. Furthermore, the proposed framework achieved benchmark accuracies of 97.1% on CASIA-B and 96.32% on OU-MVLP datasets, indicating strong cross-dataset generalization capability. The model also demonstrated computational efficiency with a minimal inference time of 11 ms per frame (77 FPS) and a compact computational cost of 1.5 GFLOPs, highlighting its suitability for real-world video-based surveillance applications. In addition, inclusion of Integrated Gradients highlights the most influential gait regions in the frame. The finding suggests that SE-ResAutoNet achieves an effective balance between accuracy, computational efficiency, and explainability, highlighting its strong potential for deployment in practical biometric and surveillance applications, subject to further validation on larger and more diverse datasets.

Indexed as

biometric identificationdeep neural networkshuman gait recognitionperson identificationSqueeze-and-Excitation (SE) blockssuspects/criminal identification

Identifiers

PMID42707462
PMCPMC13547471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.