Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707446›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Detecting reconciliation discrepancies in tabular data using transformers.

Carl Du Plessis, Mike Wa Nkongolo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carl Du PlessisDepartment of Computer Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mike Wa NkongoloDepartment of Informatics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Large organisations maintain heterogeneous datasets in data lakes, where schema variability, inconsistent formats, and semantic ambiguity complicate reconciliation. Achieving a unified view of entities requires methods that capture both structural equality and semantic relationships. Methods: We propose a transformer-based methodology that adapts pre-trained language models (PLMs) to tabular data by generating metadata-enriched embeddings (table title, column name, type, and statistics). These embeddings are compared using mutual top- Results: Experiments on large-scale tabular data (185,909 tables) demonstrate that semantic embeddings efficiently uncover relationships and discrepancies, achieving precision of 0.958 at Discussion: Unlike prior schema-aligned or query-driven approaches such as DeepJoin, WarpGate, and Lotus, this study introduces a unified reconciliation pipeline that integrates equality-based and semantic matching for large-scale tabular data. The key contribution is a scalable and generalisable reconciliation methodology that operationalises transformer architectures for automated discrepancy detection in heterogeneous environments, establishing both methodological novelty and practical effectiveness.

Indexed as

data lakesdiscrepancy detection in tabular datasetsentity matchingsemantic embeddingstransformer models

Identifiers

PMID42707446
PMCPMC13547505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.