ArticleIJU case reports2026
A Case of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy for a Third Kidney Transplant Recipient.
Article in IJU case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although robot-assisted surgery is widely used, there are few reports of robot-assisted radical cystectomy in kidney transplant recipients. We report our experience with robot-assisted radical cystectomy in a patient who had undergone three kidney transplants. Case Presentation: The patient was a 57-year-old man who had undergone three kidney transplants. Robot-assisted total cystectomy was performed for bladder CIS. Adhesions were observed in areas that had been operated on in previous surgeries, and although there were times when the surgery was difficult, it was performed safely. No major postoperative complications were observed, and the patient was discharged from the hospital on the 19th postoperative day. Conclusion: Robot-assisted surgery is one of the surgical techniques that many urologists are familiar with, and our findings suggest that it may be safe and effective even for such complex cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.