ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
From detection to action: ctDNA-MRD surveillance and translational strategies in early breast cancer.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrence remains a major cause of mortality in early breast cancer (EBC), and conventional follow-up often identifies relapse only after clinically detectable disease has emerged. Circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease (ctDNA-MRD) testing offers the possibility of detecting molecular relapse earlier and refining recurrence-risk assessment during follow-up. This narrative review examines the evolving role of ctDNA-MRD in EBC, focusing on assay interpretation, longitudinal surveillance, MRD-guided trial design, and clinical implementation. Prospective studies consistently show that postoperative or surveillance ctDNA positivity is associated with an increased risk of recurrence. However, test performance and interpretation vary with assay characteristics and sampling strategies, and whether treatment initiated solely on the basis of MRD positivity can improve patient outcomes remains unresolved. The central challenge is no longer simply to detect residual disease earlier, but to determine when and how that information should influence care. Further prospective validation, assay standardization, clear pathways for uncertain findings, and patient-centered implementation will be needed before ctDNA-MRD can be integrated into routine management of EBC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.