Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707398›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

The data substrate of exposome intelligence: an interoperability profile for untargeted metabolomics.

Thomas Hartung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas HartungDoerenkamp-Zbinden Chair for Evidence-based Toxicology, Bloomberg School of Public Health and Whiting School of Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Baltimore, MD, United States.

Funding

GEARs Combining advances in Genomics and Environmental science to accelerate Actionable Research and practice in ASDR01ES034554 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Christine Ladd-Acosta, HEATHER E VOLK · 2022 to 2026
$9.7M
NEXUS: Network for Exposomics in the U.S.U24ES036819 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Rima Habre, GARY W MILLER · 2024 to 2026
$4.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES034554NIEHS NIH HHS U24 ES036819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Untargeted metabolomics, anchored in high-resolution mass spectrometry, has matured into the central analytical platform of human exposomics. It can capture endogenous biology, diet, drugs, microbial chemistry, environmental contaminants, and their transformation products from a single biological sample. Yet exposome science remains stubbornly single-study: most untargeted exposomics publications stand alone, featuring tables, partial annotations, and semi-quantitative intensities that cannot be combined across cohorts. The bottleneck is no longer instrumentation or annotation; it is interoperability. Existing standards, including MSI, mQACC, BP4NTA, NORMAN, MERIT, mzML, mzTab-M, ISA-Tab, the Universal Spectrum Identifier, RefMet, ChEBI, MetaboLights, Metabolomics Workbench, GNPS/MassIVE, and the emerging GA4GH human exposome data standards, cover the necessary ingredients but do not yet compose a single, executable profile. I argue that the next stage of exposomics must move from FAIR deposition to meta-analysis-ready evidence: a four-layer stack of acquisition comparability, machine-readable reporting, evidence-aware annotation, and standardized summary statistics, validated by a living community benchmark. Cumulative exposome science depends on it.

Indexed as

data interoperabilityexposomeFAIR datafederated learninghigh-resolution mass spectrometrymeta-analysismetabolite annotationuntargeted metabolomics

Identifiers

PMID42707398
PMCPMC13547244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.