ReviewAdvances in orthopedics2026
Osseointegrated Dental Implants as Retention Systems for Digit Prostheses in Finger Amputations.
Review in Advances in orthopedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Finger amputation significantly impairs hand function and self-image. When surgical reconstruction or replantation is not possible, a finger prosthesis can provide cosmetic and functional benefits. However, conventional prostheses are limited by poor retention and lack of sensation. In this study, we evaluate an alternative method using osseointegrated dental implants to anchor finger prostheses, which provide stable fixation and, in turn, improve function and sensory feedback. Method: Four patients with traumatic amputations of a single finger each (thumb, index, middle, and ring fingers) underwent a two-stage surgical procedure. In the first stage, a titanium dental implant was placed into the medullary canal of the residual bone. After a three-month osseointegration period, a second-stage surgery attached a skin-penetrating abutment. Finally, a custom-made, color-matched silicone prosthesis was secured to the abutment. Outcomes were evaluated through clinical and radiographic follow-up, along with patient-reported satisfaction. Results: Three of four patients achieved successful osseointegration by three months. One thumb reconstruction was complicated by nonunion and implant loosening, requiring implant removal. One superficial abutment-site infection resolved with conservative treatment. Functional outcomes were favorable, with improved grip and pinch strength, preserved joint motion, enhanced sensibility, and high patient satisfaction with cosmetic and functional results. Conclusion: Osseointegrated dental implants may offer a feasible option for retention of digital prostheses in selected patients. Although short-term outcomes were encouraging, complications can occur, and careful patient selection and biomechanical planning are essential. Larger studies with longer follow-up are needed to confirm long-term safety, durability, and implant survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.