ArticleQatar medical journal2026
Incidence of new-onset atrial fibrillation following phenylephrine vs. norepinephrine use in septic shock patients: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Qatar medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Septic shock is a severe form of sepsis characterized by circulatory failure and organ dysfunction, often requiring vasopressor support to maintain adequate mean arterial pressure. Norepinephrine is the recommended first-line vasopressor, but new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication in septic shock patients receiving vasopressors, potentially influenced by vasopressor choice. This study compares the incidence of new-onset AF and related cardiac outcomes in septic shock patients treated with norepinephrine versus phenylephrine. Objective: To compare the incidence of new-onset AF within 72 hours of vasopressor initiation in adult septic shock patients treated with norepinephrine versus phenylephrine. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX database, including adult septic shock patients without prior AF who received either norepinephrine or phenylephrine. Propensity score matching balanced baseline characteristics across cohorts. The primary outcome was incidence of new-onset AF; secondary outcomes included cardioversion events, rate control medication use, other arrhythmias, and embolic stroke incidence. Outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Results: After matching, 138,051 patients were included in each group. New-onset AF occurred in 0.3% of norepinephrine-treated patients versus 0.01% in the phenylephrine group (OR 3.05; 95% CI: 2.55-3.65; Conclusion: In septic shock patients, norepinephrine is associated with a significantly higher risk of new-onset AF and related adverse cardiac events compared to phenylephrine. These findings suggest vasopressor choice may influence arrhythmia risk and highlight the need for prospective studies to guide optimal vasopressor selection and management strategies in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.