Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707287›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Remote work frequency and loneliness among United Kingdom employees: the moderating role of active and passive social media use.

Deshan Chen, Qiongwei Wang, Yaguang Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deshan ChenInstitute of Population Research, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Qiongwei WangSchool of Government, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yaguang YanTohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study examines the relationship between remote work frequency and loneliness and assesses the differential moderating effects of active (e.g., posting content) versus passive (e.g., scrolling or browsing content) social media use. Methods: Using data from Waves 13 and 14 (2021-2024) of the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS), comprising 7,601 individuals and 15,202 person-wave observations, this study employs fixed-effects regression models. Results: The findings reveal that higher remote work frequency is positively associated with greater loneliness ( Conclusion: Greater remote work frequency is associated with increased loneliness, but active social media use attenuates this association while passive use does not. As remote work becomes more prevalent, active rather than passive social media engagement may help offset the loneliness associated with this work arrangement.

Indexed as

active social media uselonelinesspassive social media useremote work frequencyUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID42707287
PMCPMC13547522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.