ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Molecular epidemiology of
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study in Heilongjiang, China, enrolling 69 households across 10 villages. Humans and domestic animals were sampled. Nested PCR targeting the ITS region was performed. Genotypes were determined by sequencing, and genetic diversity was assessed using DnaSP. Results: Human prevalence was 11.0% (13/118), while overall animal prevalence was 23.4% (162/693), with sheep being the highest (66.7%), followed by pigs (46.1%) and geese (20.5%). Prevalence was significantly higher in mammals than poultry (32.9% vs. 13.9%; p < 0.001). Sequence analysis yielded 29 distinct genotypes (10 known, 19 novel), with EbpC (36.0%), BEB6 (13.7%), EbpA (13.7%), and D (11.4%) being the most prevalent, most clustering within zoonotic Group 1. Discussion: Notably, zoonotic genotypes EbpC and EbpA were identified in chickens and geese, extending the known host range of these genotypes. Human-animal genotype sharing was observed in only one household (genotype EbpC between humans, pigs, chickens, and geese), while intraspecies circulation and occasional animal-animal genotype sharing were more common. Phylogenetic and network analyses suggested localized diversification, though single-locus ITS limits definitive evolutionary inference.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.