ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Integrating metagenomic next-generation sequencing into a multimodal diagnostic framework for spinal infection: enhancing etiological identification and clinical prediction.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Spinal infection (SI) remains diagnostically challenging because of heterogeneous etiologies, nonspecific clinical manifestations, and the limited sensitivity of conventional microbiological approaches, particularly following empirical antimicrobial exposure. Although metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) enables unbiased pathogen detection, its incremental clinical value beyond pathogen identification and its role within integrated diagnostic strategies remain incompletely established. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 208 consecutive patients with suspected SI between August 2022 and August 2025. Final diagnoses were established using a multidisciplinary-adjudicated composite reference standard incorporating clinical, radiological, microbiological, and histopathological evidence. The diagnostic performance of mNGS was compared with conventional culture and histopathology. Furthermore, multimodal predictive models integrating clinical variables and microbiological information were developed using L1-regularized logistic regression. Results: In the comparative cohort, mNGS achieved a significantly higher diagnostic yield than culture (66.5% vs. 27.41%, Conclusions: mNGS is a high-yield diagnostic tool for spinal infection, particularly in culture-negative and antibiotic-pretreated scenarios. Integrating mNGS into a multimodal clinical framework facilitates etiological clarity and precision antimicrobial therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.