ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Within-person reciprocal associations between problematic smartphone use and exercise adherence among university students: a four-wave random-intercept cross-lagged panel study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Problematic smartphone use (PSU) and difficulties maintaining exercise-related routines are common among university students, yet the prospective within-person relationship between PSU and self-reported exercise-adherence tendency (EA) remains unclear. Previous cross-sectional and traditional cross-lagged studies cannot cleanly separate stable between-person differences from within-person fluctuations. Objective: This four-wave longitudinal study examined reciprocal prospective associations between PSU and self-reported EA tendency using a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM). Methods: A total of 1,241 adult university students from six universities in Chengdu, China, provided valid baseline data in a four-wave offline survey conducted from March to December 2025. Longitudinal measurement invariance was evaluated with three subscale-mean indicators per construct. The primary observed-score RI-CLPM used robust maximum likelihood and full-information maximum likelihood. Directional differences were tested using time-specific within-person standardized coefficients and robust Wald tests. Sensitivity analyses included complete-case, partial-equality, multiple-indicator latent, covariate-adjusted, exerciser-only, auxiliary-variable FIML, and delta-adjusted missing-data models. Results: Scalar invariance was supported at the subscale-indicator level. EA-to-PSU associations were Conclusion: Within-person elevations in self-reported exercise-adherence tendency were prospectively associated with lower subsequent PSU, whereas the reverse paths were not statistically significant. The directional difference was not supported in the final interval, and the observational design does not establish a causal or preventive effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.