ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Reframing the starting point of shared decision-making under algorithmic short-form video exposure: bone tumor care as a sentinel context.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short-form video platforms have become a major component of the pre-consultation information environment for patients with cancer in China and may create new challenges for clinical communication. Contemporary shared decision-making (SDM) and patient decision aids (PtDAs) do not explicitly assess or calibrate beliefs formed before consultation. Algorithmic recommendation and emotionally charged narratives may therefore contribute to pre-consultation cognitive anchoring and alter the conditions under which SDM occurs. We use bone tumor care as a sentinel context rather than claiming that these patients are uniquely susceptible to algorithmic influence. Patients with primary bone tumors or bone metastases may receive immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and some patients with bone metastases also receive bone-modifying agents. Because prevention of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is most effective before bone-modifying therapy begins, cognition at the initial consultation may be particularly consequential. We hypothesize that pre-consultation anchoring could contribute to delayed reporting of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), gaps in MRONJ prevention, reduced ICI adherence, and more 90-day unplanned visits. The cited studies establish the clinical importance and recognized determinants of these outcomes but do not demonstrate that short-form video exposure causes them. To support future testing, we propose the Digital Exposure-Cognition-Anchoring assessment (DECA) framework: DECA-E records pre-consultation exposure; DECA-C screens and calibrates cognitive anchors; and DECA-L prospectively evaluates longitudinal associations across exposure, cognition, SDM, and clinical safety. DECA is an unvalidated proposal that requires feasibility and outcome evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.