ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
A qualitative study of facilitators and barriers to intraoperative acquired pressure injury prevention implementation in operating room nurses based on the CFIR framework.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Intraoperative acquired pressure injury (IAPI) is a common perioperative complication in surgical patients, and operating room nurses are the primary implementers of evidence-based IAPI prevention strategies. Although standardized evidence-based guidelines for IAPI prevention exist, their translation into clinical practice remains suboptimal. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing these prevention measures, to provide an empirical basis for the clinical translation of evidence-based IAPI prevention interventions. Methods: A descriptive qualitative research design was adopted. A semi-structured interview guide was developed in strict alignment with the CFIR 2.0 framework. Twelve operating room nurses from a tertiary general hospital in Qinghai Province were recruited via purposive sampling, and face-to-face individual interviews were conducted for data collection. Qualitative content analysis was used to code the data, and core themes were extracted from the full dataset. Results: With reference to the five core domains of the CFIR framework, 14 key factors influencing the implementation of evidence-based IAPI prevention measures were identified, categorized into 6 barriers and 8 facilitators. The barriers included: mismatch between evidence-based guidelines and operating room clinical realities; insufficient protective supplies; lack of targeted positive incentives; poor interdepartmental communication; uneven prevention competencies among nurses; and experience-dependent practice with lax adherence among some nurses. The facilitators included: multi-channel access to evidence-based information; industry policy support; aligned prevention goals among nurses; accessible professional training and guidance; emphasis and support from department managers; clinical adaptation needs; flexible implementation strategies; and nurses' awareness of self-reflection and improvement. Conclusion: The clinical implementation of evidence-based IAPI prevention measures in operating rooms is influenced by multilevel factors. The core challenges lie in the mismatch between general evidence-based guidelines and the specialized operating room setting, as well as the absence of positive incentive mechanisms. This study fills a research gap in this field and provides practical evidence for establishing a specialized evidence-based practice system for IAPI prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.