Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42707166›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

A stylometric machine learning framework for authorship attribution of ChatGPT and student generated texts.

Mani P, Adaikalam Arulanandam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mani PSchool of Social Sciences & Languages, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Adaikalam ArulanandamSchool of Social Sciences & Languages, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The surge of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has created major challenges in determining authorship, evaluating student learning, and maintaining academic integrity. Distinguishing AI-generated text from human-generated writing has therefore become increasingly important for authorship verification, educational assessment, and academic honesty. Methods: This study proposes a machine learning-based stylometric approach for authorship prediction of short-story adaptations written by non-native German language students and generated by ChatGPT. A corpus of 60 texts was created, comprising 30 student-written adaptations and 30 ChatGPT-generated adaptations based on the same source stories. The proposed framework integrates text preprocessing, stylometric feature extraction, feature selection, and machine learning-based classification. Linguistic and stylometric features included lexical diversity, word and character frequencies, sentence and paragraph length distributions, syntactic complexity, function-word usage, punctuation patterns, readability measures, and semantic consistency. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Naïve Bayes classifiers were evaluated. Results: The linguistic analysis revealed significant differences between the human-generated and AI-generated text categories. Among the evaluated classifiers, the SVM achieved the best classification performance, with an accuracy of 94.8%, precision of 93.7%, recall of 95.2%, and F1-score of 94.4%. Lexical diversity, sentence complexity, function-word frequency, and readability were identified as the most influential features in authorship prediction. Discussion: The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed stylometric framework for automated authorship attribution and AI-generated text detection. The approach has potential applications in educational assessment, plagiarism detection, forensic linguistics, authorship verification, and the development of intelligent tools for supporting academic integrity in multilingual learning environments.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedecision treefeature extractionfeature selectionrandom forestsupport vector machine (SVM)

Identifiers

PMID42707166
PMCPMC13547265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.