ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
A stylometric machine learning framework for authorship attribution of ChatGPT and student generated texts.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The surge of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has created major challenges in determining authorship, evaluating student learning, and maintaining academic integrity. Distinguishing AI-generated text from human-generated writing has therefore become increasingly important for authorship verification, educational assessment, and academic honesty. Methods: This study proposes a machine learning-based stylometric approach for authorship prediction of short-story adaptations written by non-native German language students and generated by ChatGPT. A corpus of 60 texts was created, comprising 30 student-written adaptations and 30 ChatGPT-generated adaptations based on the same source stories. The proposed framework integrates text preprocessing, stylometric feature extraction, feature selection, and machine learning-based classification. Linguistic and stylometric features included lexical diversity, word and character frequencies, sentence and paragraph length distributions, syntactic complexity, function-word usage, punctuation patterns, readability measures, and semantic consistency. Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, Decision Tree, and Naïve Bayes classifiers were evaluated. Results: The linguistic analysis revealed significant differences between the human-generated and AI-generated text categories. Among the evaluated classifiers, the SVM achieved the best classification performance, with an accuracy of 94.8%, precision of 93.7%, recall of 95.2%, and F1-score of 94.4%. Lexical diversity, sentence complexity, function-word frequency, and readability were identified as the most influential features in authorship prediction. Discussion: The findings demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed stylometric framework for automated authorship attribution and AI-generated text detection. The approach has potential applications in educational assessment, plagiarism detection, forensic linguistics, authorship verification, and the development of intelligent tools for supporting academic integrity in multilingual learning environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.