ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia2026
Factors influencing antimicrobial stewardship implementation in healthcare facilities in four countries of Southeast Asia: a mixed-methods study (2022-23).
Article in The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) implementation is highly context dependent. This mixed-methods study aimed to assess contextual factors associated with AMS implementation at national, facility, and healthcare-provider levels in four countries. Methods: We used a sequential mixed-methods approach, with a combination of quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) using the World Health Organisation's National AMS assessment tools at national, healthcare-facility, and provider levels in Indonesia, Nepal, Thailand, and Viet Nam between 2022 and 2023. Facility-level implementation was evaluated using the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Global Antibiotic Stewardship Evaluation Tool (G-ASET) in 16 hospitals across these countries. We included stakeholders and healthcare personnel involved in AMS implementation at the national and hospital levels. Findings: All four countries had national AMS policies, and two incorporated financing mechanisms into national action plans. Main areas for further improvement were the development of stewardship guidelines for primary care and community settings; stronger linkages across related sectors and programmes; expanded professional training; strengthened regulatory enforcement; systematic performance tracking; and better data use for feedback and decision-making. Among the 16 hospitals, the mean G-ASET score was 241/335 (72%), highest in tracking, monitoring and reporting [56/75 (75%)] and lowest in training and education [17/25 (66%)], and the scores varied by hospital type and size. Although all hospitals had initiated AMS activities, implementation was often partial, with gaps in data-informed treatment guidelines, staff training, and resources. Interpretation: National guidelines on treatment and stewardship initiatives are crucial and trainings for healthcare personnel need to be strengthened for facility-level AMS implementation. Enhancing inter-programme coordination and support for small-size hospitals and primary care settings in Asia will be essential to advance AMS implementation. Funding: Supported by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.