ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Factors associated with successful psychiatric intensive home treatment - a quasi-experimental study.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: With more and more Home Treatment (HT) teams being implemented worldwide as well as high variations in models and intensity of care and target groups, there is a need to look at factors associated with its success and relative effectiveness compared to inpatient treatment (IT). For doing so, we used data from the quasi-experimental evaluation of the German highly regulated model of intensive HT (IHT). Methods: Within a propensity-score matched study we compared 200 patients treated by IHT in ten psychiatric centers to 200 inpatients and assessed inpatient re-admission rate and days spent in hospital within the 12-months follow-up time. We used a set of clinical and sociodemographic variables within a multivariate regression model to evaluate the influence of variables affecting the relative effectiveness of IHT versus IT. Results: Controlling for diagnosis, age, treatment history, marital and employment status, IHT was more effective than IT for women compared to men in avoiding readmissions. Furthermore, IHT was more effective for people with less impairment and those with either no inpatient treatment history or a high number of previous hospitalizations in the last two years. Conclusion: IHT might be more beneficial in women due to their stronger preference or advantages in involving community resources among women. IHT might be suitable for those with less severe psychiatric crises but also for high utilizers to stop revolving door patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.