ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
How AI anxiety and contextual factors shape employee deviant innovation.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although employees' deviant innovative behavior lacks formal authorization, it may become a key driver of organizational innovation performance in the digital era. However, its generation mechanism-shaped by the interplay of psychological perception, organizational design, and external institutional forces-remains underexplored, particularly in the Chinese context. To investigate the motives for innovation in a turbulent era, this paper adopts the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework as the analytic system and applies fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA) to carry out a configurational study of sample data from 326 corporate employees in China. Focusing on six antecedent conditions including AI anxiety, generative AI skills, gamification of platform work, autonomous decision-making, job insecurity and government support. Based on the empirical study, the following have been found: (1) No single element in the system needs to be triggered to motivate employees' deviant innovation behavior; (2) There are three equivalent system pathways for achieving high levels of employee deviant innovation behavior, categorized as the Anxiety-autonomy driven pathway, the External supported driven pathway, and the Passive triggered driven pathway; (3) A specific combination of conditions inhibits deviant innovation (Low activation environment inhibited type), demonstrating asymmetric causal complexity with the high-drive pathways. This study breaks through the limitations of traditional linear analysis, broadens the application boundaries of the TOE framework in innovation management from a complex systems perspective, and provides valuable theoretical support and practical guidance for systematically stimulating employees' innovative potential in localized digital contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.