ReviewEcology and evolution2026
The Multiple Roles of Genetics on Freshwater Macrophyte Functional Traits in the Interplay With the Environment: A Review.
Review in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of functional trait variation is increasingly used to understand macrophyte adaptation, as traits reflect organismal performance under different ecosystem conditions. Phenotypic expression results from the interplay of genetic and environmental factors: genetics provides the molecular basis for heritable traits and constrains potential phenotypes, while the environment acts as a selective and modulatory force. However, the genetic insight into traits has rarely been addressed in freshwater macrophyte studies. This review examines the different ways in which the DNA of macrophytes interplays with the environment and contributes to the variation in their functional traits, outlining main approaches, gaps, and future challenges. Only 21 studies explicitly combined genetics with functional traits and environment in the last fifteen years. The most common approach was the use of common garden experiments to explore acclimation and adaptation in a few model species. Current studies mainly focus on morphological and growth traits that best describe macrophytes' economic strategies, with limited attention to other trait categories, while the genetic and DNA traits studied are more variable. Across studies, environmental factors generally explained a larger proportion of functional trait variation, highlighting the dominant role of phenotypic plasticity for macrophyte acclimatation, whereas genetic contribution increased under experimentally manipulated conditions. Genome size and epigenetic variation influenced phenotypic plasticity; however, the effect was different and inconsistent on traits and depended on phylogenetic relationships and geographical environment variation. In field studies of natural populations, life history traits and hydrology had a strong effect on the geographic distribution of genetic diversity and the response to selection, as well as on our ability to distinguish selection from genetic drift. Future research should enhance molecular analyses, adopt multifactorial and long-term experimental designs, develop conceptual frameworks to address the relationships between genomics, environment and functional traits and integrate emerging tools to capture macrophyte adaptation better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.